|
This page is provided as support for my talk about the University of
Kent and its site in Canterbury. This talk was given on the 21st
May 2025 under the auspices of the
University of Kent Former Staff Association.
It is provided primarily so that references can be provided in a useful
and accessible form. Suggestions for additions or improvements are
welcomed.
See also the links to my memories
on the home page.
I would like to thank the University of Kent, of course. However, they bear no
responsibility for content, or opinions expressed, on this site.
Contact
If you wish to contact me (and you don't already have my email address), you can use an online
form to make initial contact. To do so, just click
here.
The Talk
The following direct material is available:
Acknowledgements
The talk would not have been possible without the help of a number of
people, who include friends and former colleagues (and even people who
once taught me).
- Jamie Angus-Whiteoak
- Peter Brown
- Derek Butler
- Richard Collier
- Chris Dawson
- Paddy Farrell
- Ray Glover
- Denis Linfoot
- Tony McDonnell
- Ian McWhirter
- Ted Parker
- Mohamed Sobhy
References
There are many references, including books and other documents. Strictly
speaking, most of them are sources rather than references.
Books
- Hidden History - Philanthropy at the University of Kent,
Triona Fitton, 2015. ISBN 978-1-902671-92-5.
- From Vision to Reality, Graham Martin, 1990. ISBN 978-1-902671-93-2.
- University of Kent 1965-2015 - Celebrating 50 years,
University of Kent, 2015. ISBN 978-0-904938-03-6.
Other documents
Images
I have been asked for images that I mentioned during the talk, which I
didn't include due to time and space limitations. There are also others
that I feel deserve a wider audience. I will include them here as time
permits.
Maps
-
A rather poor quality outline of the
proposed site. Note the rather strange boundary 'notch' near the
centre of the picture, near the bend in the old Giles Lane. This is now
the Monkswell car park, and presumably the land wasn't initially
available.
-
Lord Holford's original plan for the
University. The proposed stadium (on land that the University never acquired)
is at bottom left.
-
A recent university map showing the
current land ownership. It is interesting to compare this with the
initial proposed site. Note the land acquired to the north, which may be
sold off for housing.
-
Two separate maps from 1962, showing the topography
and geology of the site.
-
This map
happens to show boreholes, etc. It is included here, however,
because it shows the first 500 metres of the tunnel (from the north
portal) and illustrates the possible impingement on Rutherford College.
Electronics (later Jennison)
-
There are two different views of the construction of the Jennison building.
This is during site clearance,
and this is during
construction.
-
This is a preliminary model
of how the tower was expected to work. The cabin
would be at the focus of a dish mounted on the actual roof, and would form
a radio antenna.
-
Here are three separate views of the raising of the tower:
one,
two,
and three.
-
A nice photograph of the
completed Jennison building, with the tower in and dish situ.
Note the completed (but empty) plinth in the right foreground.
-
A view from the top of the tower,
looking towards the Whitstable Road.
-
The tower was also useful for mounting other antennas, as seen in
this view.
-
Three different views of Roger Jennison's model of his proposed
sculpture, to be placed outside the Electronics building. They are here
at one, two and three.
The Tunnel
-
Here are two different invitations to parties in the tunnel;
one
and two.
They appear to date from 1968.
-
This PDF file
contains several clippings from the student newspaper of the time,
InCant, relating to the tunnel.
-
This is a picture (circa 1967) of
students out for a walk, at the north portal of the tunnel. The oval shape
of the tunnel is clear, with the bottom arch naturally filled to form a
level surface. The students are, left to right:
- Chris King (Physical Sciences/Chemistry)
- Ann Thomas (now Ann Bradford) (Physical Sciences/Physics)
- Kevin Pye wielding the boulder (Physical Sciences)
- Les Bradford (Physical Sciences/Electronics)
- Pat Balsdon (now Pat Pole) (Humanities)
- Robin Wilson (Physical Sciences)
-
This diagram
shows how the ground above the collapsed tunnel was
stabilised, using tube a manchette (or just TAM) grouting. The
grout material was PAF (Pulverised Fuel Ash from power stations, etc.)
mixed with cement.
The tube is a PVC or metal pipe in which rubber sleeves cover holes that
are drilled in the pipe at specific intervals. The tubes are inserted
into holes that have been bored into the work area. Grout is pumped to a
packer that has been slid into the tube. Seals on the packer force the
grout through the holes in the tube, past the flexible rubber sleeve, and
into the grout zone to help stabilize and/or seal it.
The diagram shows how the PFA grout is initially used to fill the tunnel
cavity. More grout is then forced in to force the ground above sideways,
to restore the natural horizontal stress and stabilise it.
Miscellaneous
Random snippets
These were picked up along the way, and are included because they may be
of some interest.
-
The collapse of the tunnel was disastrous for the University, both
operationally and financially. Kent was one of the few universities to
take out insurance against subsidence. However, the cover was only for
about half a million pounds, and the damage totalled several times that
amount.
The University Grants Committee (the major funding body at the time)
noted that the University had tried to be prudent. It
stepped in with a long term loan, at quite a high rate of interest. The
University was assured that, if remedial works were completed, the loan
would be written off. Both of these events subsequently happened.
-
The talk mentions the use of design and build contracts, which can save
money and streamline the production of new buildings. The contractor can
of course use an existing (or modified) design, which may bring down
cost.
Tyler Court was built as student residences, and the first phase (now
known as Tyler Court A) was design and build. It provides a large number
of student rooms, as well as a large reception area and other areas
which, at least initially, seemed to have no function.
When viewed from outside, it strongly resembles a Travelodge of the time.
-
It has been argued by some that the focus on the First 500 (approximately!) is all very well,
but it is rare to hear anything about the first members of staff, a number of whom are very much
still with us. Some of them contributed much of their working life to the University, yet they
are rarely mentioned or recognised.
Please take a moment to think about them, and (mentally at least) thank them for their
contribution.
|